What Does case law property sale on special power of attorney Mean?
What Does case law property sale on special power of attorney Mean?
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution may be justified when The essential norm underlying a Constitution disappears plus a new system is put in its place.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the learned counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession in the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs for being decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this aspect for interim custody of the topic premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
However it is actually made distinct that police is free to choose action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities subject matter to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused towards the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police shall also guarantee regard of the family shed in accordance with law and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they might act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate for a issue of security of your house is concerned, which is not public place under the Act 1977. nine. Taking into consideration the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition continues to be attained. As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated earlier mentioned. Read more
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a very criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically bring about exoneration from departmental charges based to the same factual grounds. Though a writ under Article 199 is accessible in specific limited situations, it truly is generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-examine witnesses and present his/her defense but did not convince the department of his/her innocence.
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents with the boy or girl will not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they're able to do if they can Minimize off social relations with the son or the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who's a major, the few is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who offers these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by law.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It's also a effectively-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve more info a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by regulation." It's properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are definitely the opinions that are filed within the day that the appellate court issues its decision and will often be not the court's final opinion.
The reason for this difference is that these civil regulation jurisdictions adhere to some tradition that the reader should manage to deduce the logic from the decision as well as the statutes.[4]
17 . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have heard the discovered counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession of your subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs for being decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this component for interim custody of the topic premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” will not be binding, but could possibly be used as persuasive authority, which is to offer substance towards the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.